Formula 1

Which F1 stars were worth the money?

As the 2025 Formula One season wraps up, the championship standings are only part of the conversation. In a sport operating under strict financial regulations though notably excluding driver salaries from the cost cap questions of value inevitably follow performance.

An analysis published this week by PlanetF1 compared each driver’s estimated salary with the number of points they scored during the season, producing a “cost per point” metric across the grid. Because F1 contracts are private, all salary figures are industry estimates rather than officially disclosed numbers.

On paper, it’s a blunt calculation: earnings divided by points scored. In practice, it offers a revealing if incomplete snapshot of return on investment.

Even champions carry a price tag

The figures show that success does not automatically equal efficiency.

Read also: Klopp under pressure at Red Bull, as exit talk grows

Max Verstappen and Lando Norris were among the season’s highest scorers, yet their substantial reported earnings placed them inside the top 10 for cost per point. Norris, who secured the drivers’ championship with seven wins, registered $135,934 per point based on salary estimates. For McLaren, that number is unlikely to prompt concern given it delivered the team’s first drivers’ title since 2008.

Charles Leclerc ranked 10th at $123,967 per point. He finished fifth overall and frequently maximized results in a Ferrari that was not consistently the quickest package. Still, with earnings reported around $30 million, his statistical return trails several lower-paid competitors.

The midfield equation

The numbers become more striking further down the standings.

Esteban Ocon’s campaign at Haas translated to $157,895 per point. Carlos Sainz Jr collected 64 points in his first year at Williams, helping the team move forward competitively, but his reported $13 million salary equated to $203,125 per point.

Read also: Donald Trump honors men’s hockey team, women’s absence raises questions

Franco Colapinto’s situation underscores the limitations of the metric. After replacing Jack Doohan mid-season at Alpine, he did not score, leaving him without a measurable return under this formula. Mid-year substitutions, however, often reflect broader team performance issues rather than a single driver’s output.

The costliest returns

At the top end of the ranking were several established names.

Lance Stroll recorded $409,091 per point in a challenging year for Aston Martin, scoring 33 points while being consistently out-qualified by teammate Fernando Alonso.

Lewis Hamilton’s first season at Ferrari produced 156 points but no podium finishes. With earnings estimated at $70.5 million, his cost per point stood at $451,923. Alonso followed at $473,214 per point despite maintaining an edge over Stroll in qualifying trim.

Read also: Gulf war put Tom Brady’s Saudi showdown in jeopardy

Pierre Gasly topped the list at $545,455 per point. The Alpine driver scored 22 points including a sixth-place finish at Silverstone yet the combination of team struggles and his comparatively higher salary left him last in PlanetF1’s efficiency ranking.

More than a spreadsheet exercise

Cost per point is, by design, unforgiving. It measures output, not leadership in the garage, technical feedback, marketing value, or long-term development influence factors that teams weigh heavily when negotiating contracts.

In modern Formula One, value rarely fits neatly into a single equation.

Source: PlanetF1

Read also: Lamine Yamal’s historic treble lifts Barcelona

Read also: Guinnes world record run cancelled due to War

Oliver Obel

Oliver Obel – Sports Content Creator & Football Specialist I’m a passionate Sports Content Creator with a strong focus on football. I write for LenteDesportiva, where I produce high-quality content that informs, entertains, and connects with football fans around the world. My work revolves around player rankings, transfer analysis, and in-depth features that explore the modern game. I combine a sharp editorial instinct with a deep understanding of football’s evolution, always aiming to deliver content that captures both insight and emotion.