FIFA has issued a firm response to the controversy surrounding Jude Bellingham’s equaliser during England’s dramatic World Cup quarter-final victory over Norway.
Norwegian players and staff believed a long goal kick from Ørjan Nyland had struck one of the cables supporting the stadium’s aerial camera system shortly before England made it 1-1.
Television footage showed the ball dropping sharply towards Elliot Anderson, who collected possession and helped launch the attack that ended with Bellingham scoring in first-half stoppage time.
Norway protested immediately, but referee Clément Turpin allowed the goal to stand and the video assistant referee did not intervene.
Read also: “Everything about Manchester United is special”: Santos completes £50m move
FIFA has now reiterated that its technical data showed no evidence of contact between the ball and the overhead cable.
FIFA rejects signal theory
According to Sportschau’s report on FIFA’s response, the connected-ball sensor did not register an impact while the ball was travelling through the air.
“There is therefore no evidence that the ball touched the cable and changed the movement of the ball,” FIFA stated.
The governing body also rejected suggestions that the ball had travelled too high for its internal sensor to communicate with the receivers installed around Miami Stadium.
Read also: “The Falklands are Argentine”: Argentina players provoke political storm after England win
“The signal was available at all times,” FIFA said.
Sixteen receivers positioned underneath the stadium roof were used to maintain communication with the match ball. FIFA said the sensor successfully registered touches immediately before and after the disputed moment, supporting its conclusion that the system had remained active.
The organisation also pointed to footage captured by the spidercam itself.
“It is clearly visible that the camera neither moved nor shook,” FIFA added.
Read also: Mads Pedersen sets retirement date with dream Copenhagen farewell
Had the ball struck one of the supporting cables, FIFA believes the impact would have caused some movement or vibration in the camera system.
Norway furious over unusual trajectory
Nyland immediately pointed towards the roof after Bellingham scored, while members of Norway’s coaching staff confronted the officials as the teams left the field at half-time.
Norway manager Ståle Solbakken later said several people on his bench had seen the alleged contact. Midfielder Sander Berge was even more direct in his criticism.
“It’s ridiculous, this one with the wire,” Berge said, as quoted by The Guardian in its examination of the incident.
Read also: “Sack him now”: Jamie O’Hara demands Tuchel’s dismissal after England collapse
Several camera angles appeared to show the ball changing direction abruptly. Others, however, suggested it had simply followed an unusual but uninterrupted flight through the air.
Former FIFA referee Mark Clattenburg said the game should have been stopped if contact had occurred, arguing that the incident would have been reviewable because it formed part of the attacking phase that led to the goal.
What the rules say
Under football’s laws, a camera cable is regarded as an outside agent because it is not part of the playing surface.
If the ball had touched the cable, the referee should have stopped play immediately. The match would then have restarted with a dropped ball at the position of the interference.
Read also: “This group is incredible”: Messi inspires Argentina’s late World Cup comeback
That means Bellingham’s goal could not have stood if contact had been confirmed.
As explained in the International Football Association Board’s official rules on dropped balls, contact with an outside agent results in the ball being dropped at the location where the interference occurred.
FIFA’s position is that there was no such interference, meaning Turpin was correct to allow play to continue.
Bellingham sends England through
Norway had taken the lead through Andreas Schjelderup before Bellingham levelled in the second minute of first-half stoppage time.
The disputed goal changed the direction of the match, although Norway continued to threaten and came close to restoring their advantage.
The quarter-final eventually went to extra time, where Bellingham scored his second goal to complete England’s 2-1 comeback and send Thomas Tuchel’s team into the semi-finals.
The controversy did not disappear with the final whistle. Clips of Nyland’s goal kick circulated widely online, with supporters using different camera angles and computer-generated reconstructions to argue both sides of the case.
FIFA’s latest explanation is intended to close the debate. The governing body has relied on three pieces of evidence: the uninterrupted connected-ball signal, the absence of an impact detected by the sensor and the lack of visible movement from the spidercam.
Those findings mean Bellingham’s equaliser will remain in the record books, even if the strange flight of the ball continues to divide viewers.
