Erling Haaland can tell Manchester City he wants to leave. He cannot make them let him go.

That is the legal point running through the week after an independent commission found City guilty of 114 of 115 Premier League financial breaches dating from 2009 to 2018. The club lodged its appeal on 1 October, insisting the ruling is “unsafe” and that it is “innocent of the accusations.” Fines, points deductions and relegation itself all stay in abeyance until that appeal is heard.

For Haaland, the paperwork is the problem. The nine-and-a-half-year extension he signed in January 2025, running to 2034, left him with no exit mechanism. Spanish outlet Sport, cited by Football365, put it plainly: “the Norwegian does not have any release clause in his contract with City in the event of relegation or any other circumstance.”

No automatic exit, even in relegation

Dan Chapman, head of sports law at Leathes Prior, told TEAMtalk that even the worst-case sporting penalty would not automatically free the squad.

Read also: Ronaldo releases long statement and accuses Jorge Jesus for his leave

“If City were relegated at the end of this or a subsequent season as a consequence of a points deduction imposed by the Commission, it does not follow that by virtue of that players will be able to walk away from the club and their contracts.”

Chapman also played down the idea that such protections are standard.

“Whilst it is possible for any player to have negotiated a relegation release clause, those clauses are quite unusual and clubs would only in very exceptional circumstances have agreed to them.”

Expulsion from the Premier League would be a different matter, Chapman said.

Read also: Haaland and Kane could soon share a frontline in blockbuster transfer twist

“A different position altogether, and it is far more likely that players would be able to terminate their contracts though is still not necessarily automatic.”

Barcelona have been talking to the agent

Barcelona have reportedly already met Haaland’s representatives in London and Paris, with Spanish reporting describing a 2027 switch as the striker’s preferred route out of Enzo Maresca’s side. Hans-Dieter Flick’s team is said to appeal to him more than Real Madrid, where Kylian Mbappé and Vinícius Júnior already occupy the forward line.

Without a clause, City set the price and the timing. The 26-year-old is reportedly earning £500,000 a week, and his January 2025 commitment made him both the player most publicly linked with an exit and the one with the least contractual room to force one.

Twelve weeks to a ruling

Sky Sports News’ Kaveh Solhekol said the appeal must be “done and dusted in 12 weeks,” with the hearing itself capped at five consecutive days. The panel is expected to rule before Christmas, with written reasons potentially slipping into late January 2027. That is the same stretch Barcelona have been eyeing for a 2027 approach.

Read also: Michael Olise makes staggering €200m demand amid Real Madrid and Liverpool interest

Read also: Ronaldinho says goodbye to Messi