Russia’s return to international sport? Vote triggers backlash

As international chess officials prepare for a key online vote, a late agenda item has reignited a wider debate that reaches far beyond the board. A proposal concerning Russia and Belarus has prompted pushback from Nordic chess leaders, who warn that easing sanctions could undermine chess’s credibility within the global sports system.

The issue will be decided at FIDE’s digital General Assembly on December 14, where delegates from national federations are expected to vote on whether restrictions introduced after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine should be relaxed.

Nordic opposition takes shape

According to a press release from the Norwegian Chess Federation, both Norway and the Nordic Chess Federation are urging delegates to reject the proposal and a related recommendation from the FIDE Council that supports lifting sanctions on Russia and Belarus.

The Nordic Chess Federation represents Denmark, Finland, the Faroe Islands, Iceland, Sweden, Norway, and Greenland. Together, the federations argue that the proposal risks placing FIDE at odds with international sporting norms.

Read also: The Brazilian football powerbroker Europe is suddenly watching closely

Sanctions rooted in international guidance

The restrictions currently in place were introduced in 2022 following guidance from the International Olympic Committee, according to the Nordic federations. Although chess is not an Olympic sport, FIDE is recognised by the IOC and expected to align its governance with Olympic principles.

Those guidelines restrict Russian and Belarusian national teams from international competition, while allowing only limited participation by individual athletes competing under neutral status.

According to the Nordic Chess Federation, no developments since the sanctions were imposed justify a change in that policy.

Questions over timing and intent

The federations have also raised concerns about how the issue reached the Assembly agenda. According to the Norwegian Chess Federation, the proposal was introduced at a late stage, creating the impression that it reflects pressure from Russian representatives and their supporters rather than a broad consensus within FIDE.

Read also: Cena’s goodbye sparks outrage and heartbreak among WWE fans worldwide

They argue that the timing risks weakening confidence in FIDE’s decision making, particularly as international sports bodies continue to face scrutiny over how they respond to geopolitical conflicts.

Legal framework and recent rulings

In their statement, the Nordic federations point to decisions by the Court of Arbitration for Sport, along with general principles of international sports law, as reinforcing the case for maintaining sanctions.

According to the press release, those rulings support continued limits on participation by Russian and Belarusian athletes, especially where national teams or national symbols are involved.

Any exceptions, they argue, should apply only to individual neutral athletes who meet strict criteria and should not extend to national representation.

Read also: Sir Alex Ferguson breaks silence after Carragher’s claims about Nemanja Vidic

A broader test for FIDE

Beyond the immediate vote, the Nordic federations frame the decision as a test of FIDE’s role within the international sports movement. According to the Norwegian Chess Federation, maintaining the sanctions is necessary to protect both the integrity of chess and the organisation’s standing among IOC recognised federations.

Ahead of the General Assembly, the federations have sent letters to national chess presidents and delegates outlining their position and confirming plans to address the congress directly.

Sources: Norwegian Chess Federation press release, Nordic Chess Federation

Read also: Bayern star turns away from England as Barcelona and Real Madrid loom

Read also: English club announce major stadium upgrade