UEFA has punished 14 clubs after completing its latest review of teams involved in last season’s European competitions.

The sanctions cover several types of financial breaches, from excessive losses to squad costs that rose above the permitted level.

It is another reminder that UEFA’s financial rules are no longer just a background threat. For several major clubs, they are now having a direct impact.

According to TV 2 Sport, Juventus, Newcastle, Aston Villa, Chelsea, Fenerbahce and Strasbourg are among the clubs sanctioned by UEFA.

Read also: Belgium vs Senegal prediction: World Cup 2026 preview, lineups & prediction

Strasbourg hit with biggest fine

The largest penalty went to Strasbourg.

According to AS, the French club received a total fine of €25 million for breaching UEFA’s squad cost rule, which limits spending on player wages, transfers and related costs to 70 percent of club revenue.

Aston Villa were also heavily punished, with a fine of €22.5 million. Of that amount, €15 million is conditional.

Fenerbahce were fined €7 million, Fiorentina €6 million, Chelsea €3 million, Newcastle €3 million, Nottingham Forest €2.5 million, AEK Athens €500,000 and Nice €450,000 for squad cost breaches.

Read also: Barcelona keeps its “valuable international experience” as Christensen extends

For Strasbourg and Aston Villa, the consequences go further than money. Both clubs were listed as serious offenders and will face restrictions on registering new players for UEFA competitions in the 2026/27 season.

Juventus and Newcastle enter settlement agreements

Not all of the sanctions relate to the squad cost rule.

Juventus and Newcastle were also found to have breached UEFA’s football earnings rule, which measures financial results across a three-year period.

Juventus have agreed to a three-year settlement with UEFA, with a total fine of €20 million. Newcastle have entered a similar settlement worth €10 million.

Read also: England vs DR Congo prediction: World Cup 2026 preview, lineups & prediction

Newcastle’s case is particularly notable because the club have not breached the Premier League’s own financial rules. UEFA’s limits are stricter, and its calculations do not treat every type of income in the same way.

According to The Guardian, Newcastle said the club had worked “closely and constructively” with UEFA and was “committed to full ongoing compliance.”

Chelsea and Villa avoid worse outcome

Chelsea and Aston Villa had already been sanctioned by UEFA in the previous season, but both clubs avoided a harsher outcome this time because UEFA accepted that their financial direction had improved.

The Guardian quoted UEFA as saying there had been an “improving trend” in the squad cost ratio of both clubs between 2024 and 2025.

Read also: Isak Hien’s World Cup ends with surgery after serious thigh injury

That matters because part of their punishment is conditional. If the clubs continue to reduce their squad cost ratio in 2026, they can avoid paying the full amount.

For Chelsea, the total fine is €3 million, with €2 million conditional. For Aston Villa, the total is far larger, but most of it is also tied to future compliance.

A warning to Europe’s biggest spenders

UEFA’s latest decisions show how much the financial landscape has changed.

The old Financial Fair Play label is still widely used, but UEFA’s current system is built around financial sustainability, especially the football earnings rule and the squad cost rule.

Read also: Tragedy strikes Mexico City World Cup celebrations as two confirmed dead

The message is clear enough: clubs can still spend heavily, but only if their revenues and financial results support it.

For wealthy clubs, that creates a new kind of pressure. Ownership money alone is not always enough. Accounting structures, transfer income, wage levels and UEFA’s own definitions of acceptable revenue now matter more than ever.

For the clubs sanctioned, the fines are painful.

For the rest of Europe, this is a serious warning.