The real question hanging over the Etihad is not the size of the points deduction. It is whether the ruling family of Abu Dhabi has already decided it is time to leave English football.
That assessment comes from Christopher M. Davidson, author of Abu Dhabi: Oil & Beyond and one of the most widely cited academic analysts of the Gulf state. Speaking to The Athletic, Davidson said the reputational cost of a failed appeal would make an exit by Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan almost impossible to avoid.
“Once there’s some time to digest this, my feeling would be that they would extricate themselves.”
“The ruling family of Abu Dhabi would feel that they had been embarrassed and disgraced by this ruling, and the best way of moving forward would be to sell now to cut the losses.”
Read also: Michael Olise broke Pelé’s World Cup record. Now Müller thinks he should win the Ballon d’Or
A verdict with historic financial numbers
An independent commission found City guilty of 114 of the 115 charges relating to financial rule breaches, in a ruling the Premier League has called the most significant in its history.
The commission concluded City used “sham” commercial contracts to artificially inflate revenues and reduce costs by more than £900m between 2009 and 2018.
Sheikh Mansour, deputy prime minister of the United Arab Emirates and a senior member of Abu Dhabi’s ruling family, bought the club in 2008.
Khaldoon’s ‘jewels’ line still stands
The chairman’s public position is the opposite of Davidson’s. In June, Khaldoon Al Mubarak flatly rejected the idea of a sale.
“Manchester City and this group within the football world is a pinnacle and these sorts of jewels you don’t sell.”
That statement, made months before the ruling, is the position the club has not updated. Davidson argues the calculation changes once the “disgraced” label is attached in writing.
“I can’t see any scenario where they would continue.”
Appeal filed at 7pm on 1 October
City moved quickly. The club lodged its appeal at 7pm local time on Thursday 1 October, arguing the ruling contains “clear material errors, of law, principle and fact” and is “unsafe”.
Read also: Juventus plant a €150m flag over Yildiz as Arsenal and Real Madrid circle
The scale of possible sanctions is where the ownership question starts to feel real. Al Jazeera reports that fines, points deductions, expulsion from the league and even title stripping are all theoretically on the table.
A new three-person panel must now hear the appeal, and the Premier League’s own rules limit the grounds to procedural or legal errors, not a retrial of the facts. Either side had 14 days from the original judgment to appeal, a window City used on the final day.
Read also: Dortmund set to drop arms manufacturer Rheinmetall after fan backlash forces a rethink
