Erling Haaland posted on Instagram after Norway’s 2-1 defeat to Portugal on Sunday. The caption read: “We stick together. Thank you for these two nights, Ullevaal.”
That was it. No mention of Manchester City. No mention of the independent commission’s finding that his club had breached 114 of the 115 charges brought by the Premier League. No mention of Arsenal or Real Madrid, both of whom have reportedly made preliminary contact with his representatives in the past few days.
Solbakken’s media blackout
The silence was not accidental. Norway manager Ståle Solbakken pulled Haaland out of pre-match press duties before the Portugal fixture, keeping the striker away from questions about a case that had nothing to do with international football.
“We naturally want him to focus and have the best possible conditions to prepare,” Solbakken said.
Read also: Kylian Mbappé names his 5 GOATS
Haaland duly scored. Norway lost anyway.
114 charges upheld, one dismissed
An independent commission found City guilty on 114 of the 115 charges covering alleged breaches of the Premier League’s financial regulations between 2009 and 2018, according to reporting from The Athletic and BBC Sport that emerged on Friday, 25 September.
The Premier League has not formally published the ruling. No sanction has been set. City are expected to appeal, and the club’s own response has been carefully neutral.
“The Premier League process remains ongoing with significant elements to be completed, and subject to strict confidentiality,” the club statement read.
Read also: Chelsea's £111m tag lands on Deco's desk
Within minutes of the reports appearing, City’s official channels posted about Haaland being voted club Player of the Month.
Arsenal and Madrid make first contact
The speculation around Haaland’s future intensified almost immediately. Arsenal and Real Madrid approached his representatives about a possible 2027 move, according to Football Insider, with Barcelona’s interest said to predate the verdict.
Neither club has made a formal offer. Haaland has not asked to leave. His contract at the Etihad runs until 2034, and prising the 26-year-old away from a deal of that length would require a fee only a handful of clubs on the planet could pay.
City are expected to appeal the ruling, and the Premier League process remains open with no sanction and no timetable set.
Read also: Julian Ward returns and Aurélien Tchouaméni is back on Liverpool's radar
Read also: Verstappen admits title dream is over after near-miss in Baku



