The French connection: When Platini opened the door
The myth of political neutrality suffered a fatal blow in November 2010, just days before the crucial vote to determine the hosts of the 2018 and 2022 World Cups. Michel Platini, the UEFA president at the time and FIFA’s heir apparent, was invited to a private lunch at the Elysée Palace.
The meeting was hosted by French President Nicolas Sarkozy, and seated at the table was the Crown Prince, now Emir, of Qatar. Platini later admitted he understood the unspoken message from the French leadership.
Shortly after this meeting, Platini and his European voting bloc supported Qatar’s bid for the 2022 World Cup. Within months, a Qatari state-backed investment fund purchased Paris Saint-Germain, and the nation launched the sports broadcasting network beIN Sports, pouring billions into French football.
This merging of state politics, vast wealth, and football governance was detailed extensively, according to an investigation by The Guardian, which noted that Platini was explicitly questioned by French anti-corruption police regarding the lunch.
Read also: "I'm on the team!" Knicks guard Tyler Kolek mistakenly grabbed by police at parade
Infantino’s transformation: Removing the watchdogs
When Gianni Infantino was elected president in February 2016, following the corruption scandal that ousted Sepp Blatter and Platini, he campaigned as a reliable technocrat. His promise was clear: to deliver a transparent and honest organization.
However, the immense power of the presidency quickly shifted his approach. He recognized the same political law of gravity that sustained his predecessors, financial distribution and political favors buy absolute loyalty.
His most blatant departure from the promise of transparency occurred in May 2017. As rumors circulated regarding his lavish spending, including the use of private jets belonging to heads of state, the independent ethics committee began asking questions. Infantino’s response was decisive.
He orchestrated the removal of the committee’s chairmen, Swiss prosecutor Cornel Borbély and German judge Hans-Joachim Eckert. This maneuver was a massive setback for anti-corruption efforts, essentially allowing Infantino to eliminate the independent oversight he had vowed to protect.
Read also: Hakimi will stand trial for rape during World Cup
The Qatar monologue: Redefining political neutrality
Under Infantino’s leadership, FIFA’s demand for “political neutrality” has been redefined to apply primarily when it shields the organization’s allies. When human rights organizations and Western media heavily criticized the treatment of migrant workers ahead of the 2022 tournament, FIFA activated its neutrality shield, urging nations to “focus on the football” and avoid handing out moral lessons.
Yet, on the eve of that same tournament, Infantino delivered an unprecedented press conference in Doha that shattered any illusion of impartiality. Acting less like a sports administrator and more like a political defense attorney, he launched into a nearly hour-long monologue.
“Today I feel Qatari. Today I feel Arab. Today I feel African. Today I feel gay. Today I feel disabled. Today I feel [like] a migrant worker,” he stated, in an attempt to show solidarity with marginalized groups while simultaneously defending the host nation.
He then used the global stage to launch a fierce political attack on Western critics, stating, “I think for what we Europeans have been doing the last 3,000 years we should be apologising for next 3,000 years before starting to give moral lessons to people.” This remarkable defense of an authoritarian regime was quoted by The Guardian, highlighting how the FIFA president actively positioned himself as a geopolitical actor rather than a neutral sporting official.
Breaking his own rules: The double World Cup award
This pragmatic hypocrisy reached a new peak in the process of selecting future World Cup hosts. Following the immense corruption scandals surrounding the simultaneous awarding of the 2018 and 2022 tournaments, Infantino himself helped establish a strict new rule in 2016: “FIFA would never again award two World Cups at the same time, precisely to prevent illicit vote-trading and backroom deals”.
Yet, in late 2023, Infantino directly contradicted the very rules he helped create. By packaging the 2030 tournament across six countries and three continents, FIFA manipulated its own continental rotation policy.
This maneuver effectively left Saudi Arabia as the only eligible bidder for 2034. The decision to secure two World Cups simultaneously was pushed through without a genuine democratic debate among member associations, clearing the path of any real competition, as described by The New York Times.
The 2026 World Cup
The blending of football and global politics culminated once more in December 2025. FIFA abandoned all pretense of political distance by establishing the inaugural “FIFA Peace Prize,” which Infantino personally awarded to Donald Trump during the 2026 World Cup draw in Washington, D.C. Question remains who the other nominees were to this award.
Read also: Neymar’s return gives Brazil a reason to believe
The paradox of an organization that sanctions players for wearing rainbow armbands while creating an international peace prize for a head of state was heavily scrutinized. The sudden creation of the award lacked a transparent selection process, as quoted by The Economic Times, further cementing the idea that FIFA’s neutrality is merely a selective tool.
Now, with the expanded 48-team 2026 World Cup actively underway across the United States, Mexico, and Canada, FIFA’s strategy appears to be an undeniable commercial triumph.
Revenues have shattered all previous records, and Infantino’s internal power remains unchallenged. Looking ahead to the 2034 World Cup in Saudi Arabia, a major political victory for Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the blueprint is complete.
From Platini’s Elysée lunch to the firing of independent ethics investigators, and from Infantino’s bizarre solidarity speech in Qatar to breaking his own anti-corruption rules to satisfy Saudi Arabia and the United States, the historical record is consistent. FIFA has never been truly neutral; they have simply mastered the art of using the illusion of neutrality to navigate and profit from global geopolitics.
Read also: Spanish media make brutal Anthony Gordon verdict after Rashford's heroics
