Trump enters the red card debate

Donald Trump has placed himself at the centre of one of the most unusual controversies of the World Cup after confirming that he contacted FIFA president Gianni Infantino about Folarin Balogun’s red card.

The United States forward was sent off during the 2-0 win over Bosnia and Herzegovina in the round of 32, a decision that triggered an automatic one-match suspension.

That would normally have ruled him out of the last-16 tie against Belgium. Instead, FIFA suspended the ban, allowing Balogun to play.

According to AP, Trump said he called Infantino to ask for the decision to be reviewed, but insisted he did not demand a particular outcome.

Read also: France’s great race faces an uncomfortable climate question

“I didn’t think it was a foul”

Trump was clear in his view of the incident.

“I didn’t think it was a foul,” he said. “I thought it was two great athletes that crashed into each other and got entangled.”

The president also criticised the original decision, calling it a “horrible” call and arguing that slow-motion video can make challenges appear more aggressive than they looked in real time.

According to The Guardian, Trump said: “That wasn’t a foul … There was two guys running full speed that happened to crash into each other.”

Read also: De Lie’s Tour ends early after another painful setback

The incident involved Balogun and Bosnia-Herzegovina defender Tarik Muharemović, with the American striker shown a red card after a VAR review.

Best players on the pitch

Trump also framed the issue around the spectacle of the tournament.

His argument was that major World Cup matches should be decided with the best players available, especially when the offence is disputed.

According to The Times, Trump said: “How would you feel if you took [Lionel] Messi or [Cristiano] Ronaldo or Harry Kane out? You can’t do that. We gotta have our best players and Belgium’s got a great team by the way.”

Read also: Neymar left in tears as Erling Haaland stuns Brazil with devastating World Cup masterclass

It was a striking intervention from a political leader into a football disciplinary matter, and it immediately raised questions over where the line should be drawn between influence and interference.

FIFA says decision was independent

FIFA has defended the process.

According to AP, Infantino said he told Trump that the matter was already before FIFA’s independent judicial bodies and that it would be decided by the relevant authorities.

“That is how FIFA’s system works, and it is a principle that I will always uphold,” Infantino said.

Read also: Ancelotti sends defiant message after Brazil’s World Cup exit

The explanation has not ended the debate. Belgium challenged Balogun’s eligibility before the match, while UEFA described FIFA’s decision as “incomprehensible and unjustifiable”.

Controversy follows USA out

Balogun ultimately started against Belgium, but his return did not change the outcome.

Belgium won 4-1 in Seattle and knocked the United States out of the tournament.

The result ended the sporting argument on the pitch, but not the wider discussion around the case. A red card, a presidential phone call and a late disciplinary reversal have left FIFA facing uncomfortable questions about consistency, transparency and political pressure at the highest level of the game.

Read also: Folarin Balogun addresses controversial World Cup ban annulment