FIFA’s decision to introduce mandatory hydration breaks in every match at the 2026 World Cup is already generating debate, with Netherlands captain Virgil van Dijk becoming one of the first major players to publicly question the policy.

The governing body confirmed earlier this year that all matches at the expanded tournament will feature a three-minute hydration break midway through each half. FIFA says the measure is designed to protect players from extreme heat and ensure consistent conditions across the competition.

However, Van Dijk suggested the policy may not be necessary in every stadium or every match.

Van Dijk Raises Concerns

The Liverpool defender spoke about the issue after the Netherlands’ 2-2 draw with Japan in Arlington, Texas.

Read also: Trump slated for World Cup trophy role, raising questions over a hypothetical Iran victory

While FIFA introduced the rule largely because of concerns over summer temperatures in several host cities across the United States, Canada and Mexico, Van Dijk pointed out that his match was played inside the climate-controlled AT&T Stadium.

Speaking to ESPN, the Dutch captain admitted he had reservations about the universal application of the breaks.

“Hydration breaks are a bit interesting, because I was obviously watching almost all the games up until today, and every time going to commercial is a bit … Not really that I like it.”

Van Dijk also questioned the impact on viewers watching at home.

Read also: Lukas Zima rejoins Petrolul following departure from champions FCSB

“I think for the neutral watchers on TV it’s also not great. If it’s really hot, obviously it would be good to put them in. But I think you have to look at it in every game, separately, in my opinion.”

His comments suggest that while players generally support measures designed to protect their welfare, some believe the need for hydration breaks should be assessed according to the conditions of each individual match.

FIFA Defends the Measure

FIFA announced the policy in December, describing it as a player-welfare initiative ahead of a tournament expected to feature challenging weather conditions in several host locations.

The organization said mandatory breaks would help ensure equal treatment for all teams regardless of venue or kickoff time.

Read also: Teammates reveal: Messi casual approach to greatness

Heat-related concerns became a major talking point during the 2025 Club World Cup in the United States, with players and coaches regularly discussing the challenges posed by high temperatures.

Rather than leaving decisions to match officials, FIFA opted to introduce a standardized approach for every World Cup fixture.

Commercial Break Debate Emerges

The policy has also attracted attention because it creates guaranteed stoppages during matches that broadcasters can use for advertising.

According to the Palm Beach Post, FIFA approved the use of commercials during hydration breaks, giving television networks dedicated advertising windows while play is paused.

Read also: Rafael van der Vaart faces backlash over 'racist' comments about Japan players

The publication reported that during a recent Mexico versus South Africa match, Fox aired full-screen commercials during a hydration break and returned to the broadcast shortly after play had resumed. Spanish-language broadcaster Telemundo took a different approach, keeping viewers focused on the field while using the break for analysis and commentary.

FIFA regulations require broadcasters to return from commercials before the match restarts, while the official clock continues running throughout the stoppage.

The possibility of additional advertising inventory has prompted discussion among fans and observers, particularly given football’s long-standing tradition of uninterrupted action.

A Talking Point Ahead of 2026

With the World Cup still months away, the debate surrounding hydration breaks is unlikely to disappear.

Read also: Messi shines as heavyweights assert dominance: The World Cup, while you were asleep

Supporters argue that protecting players in potentially dangerous heat conditions must remain the priority. Critics, including Van Dijk, believe a blanket policy may be unnecessary in matches played indoors or in milder weather.

As preparations continue for the biggest World Cup in history, FIFA’s new rule is set to remain one of the tournament’s most closely watched off-field issues.